zomaar een detail uit z'n verhaal is dat ie een pull-systeem voor supplies 'personalised' vindt en niet professionalised.
Wat vindt hij dan wel professioneel? Een push-systeem?
The military equipment supply business is personalized as opposed to professionalized: The senior leadership establishes the distribution priorities and, from what I could observe, those priorities are not based on an understanding of consumption rates, or of future operations or objective data. It's based on commander of brigade X or sector Y calling and saying, "Hey, I need 27 Javelin missiles." So, it's highly personalized, and that is not how to run wartime logistics. What should be going on is there should be an understanding of what the consumption rates are on important things like fuel, ammunition, batteries.
Ik denk dat de mening van deze mijnheer dan weer personalised is en niet professionalised.
Immers, de Amerikanen leerden de Afghanen
juist dat pull-systeem ipv push.
Op onderstaande pagina staat dat het juist de Amerikaanse doctrine is om een pull-systeem te hanteren.
PUSH AND PULL CULTURES
Logistics networks, at a very basic level, operate in two ways: pull and push.
A push network operates from forecasted data and delivers supplies based on estimated and historic requirements. Under this logistics system, the demand for items is never truly known, only projected. The practice of holding a small number of items in reserve is common to offset possible shortages.
Pull systems rely on demand-driven data; requirements are made, and exact quantities are delivered. As a result, pull networks can be seen as more dependable. But because few items are kept in stock at forward locations, pull systems tend to be slower because of the time required to deliver supplies to the requesting customer.
Demand for combat-enabling supplies such as subsistence, fuel, ammunition, and repair parts can be difficult to forecast because of the nature and unpredictability of conflict. As a result, U.S. military logistics tends to operate a pull system. Units on the front lines do not have stockpiles of supplies and, therefore, move quickly and take advantage of opportunities in their areas of operations. Fewer items being stocked and transported creates a lean system that reduces wasteful shipments. A pull system is what coalition advisers are attempting to create in the Afghan military.
The adoption of the pull system has not been widely accepted by Afghan military leaders and logisticians. Receiving supplies only when required is counter to the Afghan culture.
https://www.army.mil/arti...es%20wasteful%20shipments.
Die consumption rate krijg je dus vanzelf in beeld middels dat pull-systeem.
Higher command kan dan na verloop van tijd een patroon zien en daar alvast voor reserveren maar de pull blijft ipv push.
Of ik begrijp het verkeerd maar wat deze mijnheer zegt klinkt meer als push en dat druist juist tegen de Amerikaanse pull-doctrine in.
[
Voor 34% gewijzigd door
Verwijderd op 06-05-2022 15:21
]