Thank you MikeyMan. To be honest, it has always been a mystery to me how do other people are getting their numbers. I try to be as transparent as possible with my methods, showing you all the laps that I used to get my calculations, and which mathematical tools I am using.
I like to use the median for fp2 analyses because we do not have many data points. The mean (average) is extremely sensitive to outliers and that could create misleading results.
I don't know if Dan is using the mean, median, geometrical mean or what exactly. I also do not know if he's perhaps taking laps 17 to 24 from HAM, and then removing data points, and finally getting his results from that. It is hard to understand exactly what do the numbers mean and how reliable they are if I know nothing about the methodology.