Bijzonder;
Skeaff e.a. (2009) wat hier wordt geciteerd is nl ook mijn bron. En als ik dat onderzoek erbij pak zie ik de volgende conclusies staan:
"Intake of total fat was not significantly associated with
Coronary Heart Disease mortality, with a Relative Risk for highest compared with the
lowest category of 0.94 (95% CI 0.74–1.18, p = 0.583; fig. 1 ).
Intake of total fat was also unrelated to CHD events (RR
0.93, 95% CI 0.84–1.03, p = 0.177)."
"Intake of Saturated Fatty Acids was not significantly associated with
CHD mortality, with a RR of 1.14 (95% CI 0.82–1.60, p =
0.431) for those in the highest compared with the lowest
category of SFA intake ( fig. 6 )."
"Intake of MonoUnsaturated Fatty Acids was not significantly associated with
CHD mortality, with a RR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.60–1.20, p =
0.356) for those in the highest compared with the lowest
category of MUFA intake"
"Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies of PolyUnsaturated Fatty Acids and CHD
Intake of PUFA was strongly significantly associated
with CHD mortality, with a RR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.06–1.47,
p = 0.009) for the highest compared with the lowest category ( fig. 12 ). Conversely, high compared with low PUFA intake was not associated with CHD events"
"Diets involving a change in the polyunsaturated
to saturated fat (P/S) ratio of the diet, with or without a reduction in total fat intake;
High P/S diets reduced the risk of total CHD events
(RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–1.00, p = 0.050)"
Dat is dus een hele andere conclusie. Maar we gaan nogal off topic, dus laten we het maar weer over eten hebben