Zakenblad Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/sit...-thats-not-a-distraction/
Smartwatches, at their core, are notification machines [...] This is a basic mission, but one that many smartwatches do a pretty lousy job of tackling. While these devices seek to dial down the distractions, they end up being one themselves. A smartwatch should dissapear. Very few actually do.
The Apple Watch is the first LCD smartwatch that actually handles this issue in a sensible manner. With the Apple Watch, notifications cause your wrist to vibrate, but the screen does not light up at first. The genius touch: Thanks to clever use of an internal accelerometer, the screen only comes alive when you turn your wrist towards your face, so as to look at it.
In fact, Apple can’t get enough credit for its thought-through integration of the accelerometer into the Apple Watch. As a user, a quick flick of the wrist is a natural and discreet way of signaling to the device that I want to engage with the device.
Gelukkig staan er comments onder:
I’m not so sure I would call it the “first”. It may do some things better, but I wouldn’t say it is the pioneer in many of them. Have you used the Motorola 360? Mine does most of the things you mentioned in the article by default.
At it again forbes SHAMELESSLY promoting everything apple. even when they launch this half baked watch. Forbes makes faux news tame. I dont know how much money apple pays forbes
I’m struggling to come to terms with the blatant favoritism in this article. You describe the features of the Apple watch, and how it “isn’t a distraction”, as if Android Wear never existed. I’ve used Android Wear exactly how you’re using this Apple Watch, for the better part of a year.
Nog een ander, leuker artikeltje:
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/...twatch-apple-watch-629936
[
Voor 3% gewijzigd door
barchettanl op 27-04-2015 08:28
]