tnx Shemez..
viptweak
De maker zegt dus dat je niet alles moet geloven, dat het mogelijk is dat teksten verkeerd opgevat zijn en dat geen enkele bron zorgvuldig is nagetrokken. Alles is met een Pro-UFO bril bekeken en het zijn alleen geruchten.
Als je op had gelet dan had je gemerkt dat deze opmerking als eerder geplaatst was
en mijn antwoord daarop op was
maarreuh.. de autheur van die website
bedoelt daar mee te zeggen dat je ( net als normaal ) niet alles zomaar aan moet nemen wat je voorgeschoteld krijgt en dat je zelf moet uitzoeken of het klopt ..
want een hoop quotes kloppen we
Denk jij dat ik dan nog verder lees??
moet je zelf weten .. jij bent degene die jezelf tekort doet
blouwe kip .. als jij niet in staat bent om met een berekening te komen dan doe ik het wel voor je..
Let's play around with the Greenbank equation. In our galaxy alone, there are an estimated 100 to 400 Billion stars, but let’s make the number 200 billion. Out of 200 billion, perhaps 66 billion, or one third of them have planets. Let’s say, just to be conservative, that our own solar system has about double the average, which we’ll make, of 5 planets. That makes 330 billion planets. And of those, perhaps 10% (33 billion) are planets capable of sustaining some form of life (note: If our solar system is any indication, the number should be higher than this, as life could theoretically exist in one form or another at one time or another on at least two and probably more like three of our own planets and moons. --i.e. Earth, Mars, and Europa, but we’re not counting moons here.) If we say that life will actually evolve on 1 in 100 of those habitable planets, (again, it looks as though the numbers in our own solar system may be much higher—possibly moving up from 1 in 3 to 2 in 3 or conceivably 3 in 3) we now have 330 million inhabited planets. Of those, perhaps one in a thousand will develop an intelligent form of life. We now have 330,000 planets with intelligent inhabitants. Suppose fifty percent of those will actually develop some form of advanced technology such as our own. That brings the number to 165,000. Now, if 1 in a thousand of those planets manage to find a way to live peacefully together, that will give us 165 basically immortal civilizations in any group of 200 billion stars produced by our galaxy. In other words, a technologically advanced peaceful civilization is likely to move (at least in part) off-planet, and possibly colonize other worlds, and other star systems, making them effectively immortal. This means that their technological progression will continue indefinitely, depending on whether or not there are limits to what the civilization can do or wants to do with technology. If there is a possibility that the speed of light problem can be circumvented, as can be theorized even by us evolutionary primitives (e.g. wormholes, gravitational bending of space, quantum theories of nonlocality, etc.), then eventually, a civilization who wants to figure out how to do it, will. And once they do, they can go anywhere instantaneously.
Now, remember that we are currently talking about a group of 165 hypothetical immortal civilizations produced by the 200 billion currently visible stars in our little galaxy. We must remember that there have probably been stars before these and after these, that may have produced more civilizations than this. But lets say that these two hundred billion stars are the only ones we have to work with in our galaxy. We have 165 immortal civilizations, more than likely with hundreds of thousands if not millions or billions of years of advanced technological experience under their belts. Keep in mind that our own civilization has had less than 30 or 40,000 days worth of experience with "advanced technology."
So where are these guys? This is known as Fermi’s Paradox. As Fermi pointed out, even a civilization as technologically primitive as our own, given the resources and desire to do so, could conceivably colonize the entire Milky Way Galaxy in about 50 million years, assuming technology didn’t advance during that time making the process faster. The universe is thought to be around 15 billion years old. That’s enough time for somebody to make such a snail-paced journey 300 times. Certainly, if there are more than a few civilizations like our own out there, at least one of them would be here now. And as we have seen, it is not unlikely there are a couple of hundred of them out there who are ahead of us by millenia piled on millenia. Where are they? Most SETI astronomers have an answer like this: “We know they're not here, but it would be foolish for us not to gamble on them being out there somewhere when the odds seem to be so good that they are, and with such an incalculable payoff if we do make Contact.” Don’t get me wrong. I’m a big supporter of SETI’s efforts. I agree completely with the main thrust of their answer, because I may be wrong about UFOs. Maybe Fermi’s paradox really is a paradox, but I don’t think we can rush to that conclusion.
UFOs are real. That much is certain. Objects of a currently unexplainable nature have been seen in the sky for thousands of years. They have been recorded in pre-modern times by priests, military commanders, possibly even by pre-historic artists in caves around the world. In modern times they have been repeatedly photographed, tracked on radar, sighted, chased, and even fired upon. Planes and pilots have been lost in pursuing them (see military quotes page). They are, as General Nathan F. Twining put it, “something real and not visionary or fictitious.”
The only question is what these things in the sky are. Certainly there are hoaxes. Certainly a majority of sightings are misidentified natural or man-made phenomena. But hoaxes do not shoot down pursuing aircraft. Natural and man-made phenomena do not (as far as we know) hover over nuclear missile bases in the United States and the Soviet Union and turn missiles on and off. The best hypothesis we have at this moment is the extra-terrestrial hypothesis. Those guys from the equation… I think they’re here. This needs to be taken seriously. The SETI guys are right in their answer to the Fermi Paradox, but I am too, and for the same reason.
Matt Vest
July 22, 1999
mwa blijkbaar toch niet te vergelijken met de kans op het bestaan van roze gespikkelde olifantjes
Ik kon helaas die site niet bereiken, maar ik heb meer posts van flamez gelezen en ik daaruit blijkt absoluut niets van een hoog iq (niets persoonlijks oid)
whehe
deze opmerking valt onder subjectieve mening... en word veroorzaakt door het feit dat jij al bij voorbaat mijn argumenten niet wil accepteren, omdat het niet in jouw wereldbeeld past.. en laat je ook vooral niet misleiden door het feit dat ik geen dure woorden en moeilijke formules hanteer
Ongetwijfeld klopt dat, maar hoe kom jij er dan bij om te geloven dat het aliens waren...
ik doe een verslag van wat ik heb meegemaakt.. en nergens claim ik dat het aliëns zijn.. ik meen wel dat het een UFO was ( je weet toch wel waar de letters UFO voor staan hè )
dat is namelijk dezelfde redenatie die mensen vroeger liet geloven dat de aarde plat was en dat de zon om ons heendraaide
ja en het zijn types als jouw geweest die maar niet wilden accepteren dat het anders was, want het zou niet conform de bestaande wetenschap zijn..
Ik heb zelf nog nooit een respectabele wetenschapper horen blaten over aliens die hij/zij gezien had..en een wetnschapper die denkt dat een lichtje aan de hemel een ruimteschip is, zonder verder bewijs, vind ik geen respectabele wetenschapper, wat voor een andere verdienste hij/zij ook heeft.
waaaahahahahahahaha dit is nou precies de instelling waarom wetenschappers huiveren om er uitspraken over te doen
en Werner von Braun, Clark c McLelland ,Dr. Richard F. Haines, oa. noem jij geen respectabele wetenschappers..

Jij hebt sterk de neiging om de mening van allerlei mensen als voldoende bewijs te zien,
ja wat is daar mis mee als het zulke vooraanstaande en gerenomeerde personen zijn
ik heb meer vertrouwen in hun dan in de persvoorlichter van de overheid