Doomed door CERN: worden risico's kernfusie onderschat?

[Joepi]

Er is een interessante dicussie omtrent de mogelijk fatale ingebruikname binnenkort (herfst) van de 'Large Hadron Collider' (LHC) in Geneve:
http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Welcome.html

Info:

This fund has been established by Walter L. Wagner, a nuclear physicist, to initiate legal action to require that CERN and the Large Hadron Collider engage in a full safety analysis for all potential theoretical hazards inadequately addressed to-date. Such hazards include theoretical miniature black holes, theoretical strangelets, deSitter Space transitions, etc. The existing "cosmic ray argument" has been proven falacious for a variety of reasons [see risk-evaluation forum], and no existing proof of safety is currently available. The LHC propaganda machine that 'everything is safe' is well funded by your tax dollars, paying large salaries to thousands of people who have much to lose financially should the LHC be unable to prove its safety. As most of them perceive the risk to be small, they are willing to take that 'small risk' at our expense. The actual risk cannot presently be calculated.

http://www.lhcdefense.org/
Worden de risico's van kernfusie soms op een manier onderschat, die men niet 'in de gaten heeft'?
Hoe denken jullie erover?

[Osiris]

En nu de link met "kernfusie" aub?

Naar mijn weten is de LHC puur een onderzoeks-apparaat.

[Delerium]

Maaruh: Er liep al een topic hierover:

LHC - Large Hadron Collider & zwarte gaten

[Confusion]

Zoals gezegd: er loopt al een draad. Bovendien heeft dit niets met kernfusie te maken.