2 testen gedaan,
1 overclockt, andere niet,
miss eens intersant om ze te vergelijken met elkaar qua prestaties..
telkens met
1. HTC Universal
2.rom version 2.09.01 BL+ met Radio version 1.17.00 laatsten van op xda
running programma's: WkTask, SPB bench, ActiveSync
3. 1e test variabel met min 300 en max 624MHz, 2e test standaard op 520MHz
4. ook word test niet
test1 (dynamische speed 300-624MHz)
Spb Benchmark index: 570.6
CPU index: 1827.87
File system index: 271.72
Graphics index: 759.78
XML:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
| - <benchmark-results>
- <info>
<platform-name>PU10</platform-name>
<device-name>htc universal</device-name>
<start-date>05.23.2008</start-date>
</info>
- <main-tests>
<fs-largefilewrite>1541.300000</fs-largefilewrite>
<fs-largefileread>291.600000</fs-largefileread>
<fs-largefilecopy>1604.500000</fs-largefilecopy>
<fs-manyfileswrite>5661.000000</fs-manyfileswrite>
<fs-manyfilesread>577.900000</fs-manyfilesread>
<fs-manyfilescopy>6282.500000</fs-manyfilescopy>
<fs-dirlisting>281.500000</fs-dirlisting>
<fs-db>574.900000</fs-db>
<grf-ddb>17.890000</grf-ddb>
<grf-dib>115.985000</grf-dib>
<grf-gapi>9.400000</grf-gapi>
<builtin-pie-html>4896.200000</builtin-pie-html>
<builtin-pie-jpeg>2651.200000</builtin-pie-jpeg>
<builtin-fe>2651.200000</builtin-fe>
<misc-zip>4503.400000</misc-zip>
<misc-jpeg>474.800000</misc-jpeg>
<misc-arkaball>10.956000</misc-arkaball>
<misc-mflops>3809.500000</misc-mflops>
<misc-mops>883.600000</misc-mops>
<misc-mwips>7923.200000</misc-mwips>
<misc-memcpy>9.834000</misc-memcpy>
</main-tests>
</benchmark-results>
|
2e test, ditmaal zelfde config, enkel de dynamic CPU uitgeschakeld
Spb Benchmark index: 540.09
CPU index: 1830.61
File system index: 253.37
Graphics index: 722.82
XML:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
| - <benchmark-results>
- <info>
<platform-name>PU10</platform-name>
<device-name>htc universal</device-name>
<start-date>05.22.2008</start-date>
</info>
- <main-tests>
<fs-largefilewrite>1566.200000</fs-largefilewrite>
<fs-largefileread>313.800000</fs-largefileread>
<fs-largefilecopy>1643.600000</fs-largefilecopy>
<fs-manyfileswrite>5522.100000</fs-manyfileswrite>
<fs-manyfilesread>637.200000</fs-manyfilesread>
<fs-manyfilescopy>6767.600000</fs-manyfilescopy>
<fs-dirlisting>286.000000</fs-dirlisting>
<fs-db>2124.800000</fs-db>
<grf-ddb>18.050000</grf-ddb>
<grf-dib>115.365000</grf-dib>
<grf-gapi>10.180000</grf-gapi>
<builtin-pie-html>5244.400000</builtin-pie-html>
<builtin-pie-jpeg>2931.800000</builtin-pie-jpeg>
<builtin-fe>2365.300000</builtin-fe>
<misc-zip>4479.300000</misc-zip>
<misc-jpeg>475.500000</misc-jpeg>
<misc-arkaball>10.842000</misc-arkaball>
<misc-mflops>3797.300000</misc-mflops>
<misc-mops>884.000000</misc-mops>
<misc-mwips>7915.200000</misc-mwips>
<misc-memcpy>9.821000</misc-memcpy>
</main-tests>
</benchmark-results>
|
toch zeer vreemd dat de cpu niet beter zijn als hij op dynamisch draait
op ander vlak heeft hij dan wel iets meer voorsprong, maar scheelt bijna niets...
misschien omdat hij soms op 300 draait om stroom te besparen?