Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines
tnx voor de snelle reactie, de reviews op de sites die genoemd worden had ik grotendeels al doorgelezen. Er komt helaas niet echt duidelijk naar voren wat nu de voordelen van de A85 boven de A75 behalve de extra megapixel.
Beide eindconclusies zijn als volgt:
A75:
As I mentioned at the outset, Canon's PowerShot A70 topped the charts in Canon's sales last year, outstripping all other camera models. - And for good reason: The A70 offered a rich set of features and excellent image quality at an attractive price. This year, the PowerShot A75 appears poised to follow in the A70's and A40's footsteps. Relative to last year's model, the A75 offers a better, nine-point autofocus system, a bigger monitor, a slightly more accurate optical viewfinder, and faster overall performance. Image sharpness on the A75 was a bit of a puzzle: Some of the its studio images weren't as sharp as those from last year's A70, but more-distant subjects outdoors were as sharp or sharper. A little hard to call, but on the whole, I'd say the A75 performs about the same as last year's excellent A70. Overall, Canon has taken an almost perfect combination of features, image quality and price, added a bunch of key features from its S-series digicams and cut the price by $50 to make a premier camera for the mid-level consumer market that's also a bargain. If you're looking for a great "all around" digicam, the A75 certainly deserves your serious consideration.
A85:
As I mentioned at the outset, Canon's PowerShot A70 topped the charts in Canon's sales last year, outstripping all other camera models. - And for good reason: The A70 offered a rich set of features and excellent image quality at an attractive price. This year, the PowerShot A85 appears poised to follow in the A70's footsteps. Relative to last year's model, the A85 offers a better, nine-point autofocus system, a bigger monitor, a slightly more accurate optical viewfinder, and faster overall performance. The A85's image sharpness is just a tad off that of the best 4-megapixel cameras on the market, but is more than good enough to make sharp-looking 8x10 prints. Its color is very appealing, even though its handling of blues appears to be tweaked a little from what would be absolutely accurate - The nature of the blue tweak appears to be such that the A85 will render better-looking sky colors, something most users would probably prefer to an absolutely faithful portrayal. Overall, Canon has taken an almost perfect combination of features, image quality and price, included a number of key features from its S-series digicams delivered the combination at a very attractive price, making a premier camera for the mid-level consumer market that's also a bargain. If you're looking for a great "all around" digicam, the A85 certainly deserves your serious consideration. - It's an easy "Dave's Pick," as one of the better models on the market.
beide van imaging resource.
Uit de samenvatting komt naar voren dat de A85 wel meer dan gemiddelde ruisniveau in de foto's heeft terwijl daar bij de A75 niet over wordt gesproken. Ook de testfoto's in de review lijken een klein beetje overbelicht en wat ruisig. Wat is jullie mening?
link naar testfoto's A85: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/A85/A85A.HTM
Beide eindconclusies zijn als volgt:
A75:
As I mentioned at the outset, Canon's PowerShot A70 topped the charts in Canon's sales last year, outstripping all other camera models. - And for good reason: The A70 offered a rich set of features and excellent image quality at an attractive price. This year, the PowerShot A75 appears poised to follow in the A70's and A40's footsteps. Relative to last year's model, the A75 offers a better, nine-point autofocus system, a bigger monitor, a slightly more accurate optical viewfinder, and faster overall performance. Image sharpness on the A75 was a bit of a puzzle: Some of the its studio images weren't as sharp as those from last year's A70, but more-distant subjects outdoors were as sharp or sharper. A little hard to call, but on the whole, I'd say the A75 performs about the same as last year's excellent A70. Overall, Canon has taken an almost perfect combination of features, image quality and price, added a bunch of key features from its S-series digicams and cut the price by $50 to make a premier camera for the mid-level consumer market that's also a bargain. If you're looking for a great "all around" digicam, the A75 certainly deserves your serious consideration.
A85:
As I mentioned at the outset, Canon's PowerShot A70 topped the charts in Canon's sales last year, outstripping all other camera models. - And for good reason: The A70 offered a rich set of features and excellent image quality at an attractive price. This year, the PowerShot A85 appears poised to follow in the A70's footsteps. Relative to last year's model, the A85 offers a better, nine-point autofocus system, a bigger monitor, a slightly more accurate optical viewfinder, and faster overall performance. The A85's image sharpness is just a tad off that of the best 4-megapixel cameras on the market, but is more than good enough to make sharp-looking 8x10 prints. Its color is very appealing, even though its handling of blues appears to be tweaked a little from what would be absolutely accurate - The nature of the blue tweak appears to be such that the A85 will render better-looking sky colors, something most users would probably prefer to an absolutely faithful portrayal. Overall, Canon has taken an almost perfect combination of features, image quality and price, included a number of key features from its S-series digicams delivered the combination at a very attractive price, making a premier camera for the mid-level consumer market that's also a bargain. If you're looking for a great "all around" digicam, the A85 certainly deserves your serious consideration. - It's an easy "Dave's Pick," as one of the better models on the market.
beide van imaging resource.
Uit de samenvatting komt naar voren dat de A85 wel meer dan gemiddelde ruisniveau in de foto's heeft terwijl daar bij de A75 niet over wordt gesproken. Ook de testfoto's in de review lijken een klein beetje overbelicht en wat ruisig. Wat is jullie mening?
link naar testfoto's A85: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/A85/A85A.HTM
[ Voor 4% gewijzigd door Kr3Kr op 12-12-2004 20:46 ]
het verschil is idd een megapixel, voor de rest zijn ze hetzelfde
dat de a85 meer ruis heeft is dus logisch, omdat deze meer megapixels op dezelfde sensor heeft.
dat de a85 meer ruis heeft is dus logisch, omdat deze meer megapixels op dezelfde sensor heeft.
dat is dus wat ik wou weten, het is dus dezelfde sensor. Dan denk ik dat ik voor de A75 ga, tnxdribbel schreef op zondag 12 december 2004 @ 21:16:
het verschil is idd een megapixel, voor de rest zijn ze hetzelfde
dat de a85 meer ruis heeft is dus logisch, omdat deze meer megapixels op dezelfde sensor heeft.
Pagina: 1