Toon posts:

rumor: 90nm 2,6 Ghz powerpcFX 970 in januari?

Pagina: 1
Acties:
  • 22 views sinds 30-01-2008

Verwijderd

Topicstarter
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=260

"""
IBM will, indeed, begin delivering volume quantities of its new 90-nanometer (nm) based PowerPC 970 G5 to Apple Computer next month, sources confirmed last evening. These new microprocessors are rumored to become the brains behind the first revision to Apple's Power Mac G5 desktop computer line -- known to sources solely by the reference tag 'Power Mac 8,1.'

Up until now, the 90nm G5 has unofficially been deemed the 'PowerPC 970+' by Apple enthusiast and online journalists following IBM's PowerPC roadmap. Most recently, however, IBM contractors have begun slipping the name 'PowerPC 970FX' when referring to the chip.

Although the PowerPC 970FX makes great strides in the realm of power consumption, it is still hungry compared to the rest of the PowerPC family, one source said. At the lowest -- albeit unknown -- clock-speed, the PowerPC 970FX dissipates approximately 12-Watts. Preliminary tests conducted earlier in the year on a 2.5GHz PowerPC 970FX G5, built around the 90nm process, showed the processor to dissipate 62-Watts. For comparison, a chip of equal clock frequency, which was manufactured on IBM's current 130nm process, dissipated a considerable 96 watts.

Among is many advancements, the PowerPC 970FX will also boast a feature called 'PowerTune,' which allows for rapid frequency and power scaling, and features electronic fusing.

The chip was officially taped out in November, and is reportedly being manufactured on an SSOI process (Strained Silicon on Insulator). "Unlike Intel, IBM has kept current leakage to a minimum using SOI, and using SOI on strained silicon will reduce current leakage by a further 15%," sources told AppleInsider last month.

Meanwhile, Apple has been prepping its own hardware to accompany the updated microprocessor. According to earlier reports, the Power Mac 8,1 will sport a 'U3 revision II' system controller and include support for 533 DDR II RAM. The units are also rumored to feature a ASIC controller built around the 90nm technology and support a front side bus of up to 1.5Ghz.

Industry insiders and sources close to Apple are sighting a high probability that these new machines will make an appearance during Apple's annual Macworld San Francisco trade show, which takes place in the first week of January. Volume shipments of the units to consumers and the retail channel may take a little long, sources said, citing dates from late January to early March.

The Cupertino based computer maker will reportedly proceed with a set of Power Macs in the latter half of 2004 based on the Power PC 980 -- a chip that will elevate its professional desktop line well beyond the 3GHz barrier.
"""

  • MacWolf
  • Registratie: Januari 2004
  • Laatst online: 06-09-2024
Volgende gerucht heeft min of meer met dit (zeer passieve) topic te maken:
http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2005/03/20050311072804.shtml

Ik citeer:
Earlier this week, a MacRumors Page 2 article reported that the most recent Apple CHUD Developer tools had made minor UI changes allowing for the possibility of upcoming Quad processor Macs.

The changes were somewhat speculative as the changes are as seen here (old on top, new on bottom).

More evidence pointing specifically to Quad processor support, however, can be seen in the MONster.app seen posted here showing checkboxes for 4 CPUs.

Of even more interest, however, is internal references to a processor called the PPC 970MP.

The 970MP is an unannounced processor which was first referenced in a rumor report from July 2004. The 970MP was described as a dual-core processor with two interconnected microprocessors each with its own 1MB L2 Cache. A few additional details can be found in this 2004 eWeek report.
Een dual-core G5 of een PowerMac met 4 G5 processoren (ook dual-core :9~) zou erg gaaf zijn...

Het gerucht is dus gebaseerd op o.a. de volgende plaatjes:
Afbeeldingslocatie: http://cakili.image.pbase.com/image/40657875.jpg

Afbeeldingslocatie: http://cakili.image.pbase.com/image/40664266.jpg

En als laatste is de volgende link nog interessant: http://www.articasemi.com/page1.html
Ik weet niet wat het bedrijf aRTiCA Semiconductor precies doet, maar het plaatje is veelbelovend:
Afbeeldingslocatie: http://www.articasemi.com/files/1_1.png

[ Voor 23% gewijzigd door MacWolf op 12-03-2005 01:26 ]

Microsoft Windows: A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.


  • Maximus
  • Registratie: Mei 2002
  • Laatst online: 20:30

Maximus

There is no substitute

zie hier: Policy Apple Talk (APL) (Updated 6 maart 2005)

en dan punt 4:

geruchten topics zijn alleen toegestaan indien er aan minimaal 3 bronnen gerefereerd kan worden waarbij de frontpage geen bron is.

Gezien ik hier maar 1 bron zie namelijk de appleinsider site, kan ik niet anders concluderen dat dit een rumor topic is met minder als 1 bron, welke niet mag volgens de Policy zoals deze gesteld is op 6 maart 2005. :)

[ Voor 2% gewijzigd door Maximus op 11-03-2005 18:43 . Reden: smilie moest van dawuss, anders te serieus :? ]

PhD i.o. | You know what, Stewie, if you don’t like it, go on the Internet and complain.


  • HyperioN
  • Registratie: April 2003
  • Laatst online: 12-02 13:45
Laat ze eerst maar 's de G5 in de *Books gooien :O

  • chem
  • Registratie: Oktober 2000
  • Laatst online: 12-02 10:41

chem

Reist de wereld rond

Maximus schreef op vrijdag 11 maart 2005 @ 18:25:
zie hier: Policy Apple Talk (APL) (Updated 6 maart 2005)

en dan punt 4:

geruchten topics zijn alleen toegestaan indien er aan minimaal 3 bronnen gerefereerd kan worden waarbij de frontpage geen bron is.

Gezien ik hier maar 1 bron zie namelijk de appleinsider site, kan ik niet anders concluderen dat dit een rumor topic is met minder als 1 bron, welke niet mag volgens de Policy zoals deze gesteld is op 6 maart 2005. :)
Maximus heeft gelijk; we willen meerdere bronnen hebben, want Apple heeft een geruchten-buzz om zich heen waar we een apart forum over zouden kunnen beginnen.

Klaar voor een nieuwe uitdaging.


Dit topic is gesloten.