<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica>quote:</font><HR>New Theory of Solar Stability
[Original headline: Hubli scientists propose new theory of solar stability ]
Hubli, India: If pure gravitation existed between stellar bodies, then each would be "sucked into" one great whole. Though this sounds a composite philosophical premise, this does not define the physical universe, according to a radically new theory of solar stability.
Two noted astrophysicists from Hubli Dr Navin Shah and Pankaj Jain have put forth the theory of Strepulsion-Retraction as against the Newtonian laws of gravitation and Einsteins theory of relativity.
So is the whole theory of gravitation-relativity incorrect? Yes, says Dr Shah who says that "there are two universal forces strepulsion and retraction. All stars exert Stellar Repulsion Force (SRF) or strepulsion which is repulsive in nature while the planetary bodies exert attractive forces. So in a solar system Retraction is the force which arises when SRF interacts with gravitation. This interaction between SRF and gravitation gives rise to the orbital motion and rotation of the planetary bodies.
Speaking to The Times of India Dr Shah says that, the whole premise of modern physics (read western) which is based on the gravitation-relativity theory is wrong. "The Sun contains 98.8 per cent of the mass of the solar system and the remaining is in the planetary bodies. So if one would go by gravity then all the planets would have been embedded into the Sun. Even Einstein's theory is philosophical paradigm because time and space are constructs of the mind and do not exist."
Elaborating further, Dr Shah says, SRF is originated under Thermonuclear Reactions (TNR) in the stars. Fifty per cent of the energy liberated from the stars under TNR is in the form of strepulsion force and other half contains light, heat and plasma particles. Owing to nuclear origin intensity of SRF is million times greater than gravitational intensity.
The theory can explain all astrophysical phenomenon, expansion, neutron stars, blackholes, meteorites etc and offers celestial occurrences to validate the strepulsion. The other proof that the sun exerts repulsion force is anti-solar ejection of solar wind, anti-solar deflection comet tail, anti-solar defusion of magnetosphere, higher ocean tides on full moon midnight than on new-moon midday, anti-solar displacement of star rays during solar eclipse, radiation of red-shift of star-light in vicinity of the sun.
So now with this new theory what would be its impact on physics? Space-programmes would move years ahead if SRF energy is utilised as fuel to navigate and reach the various pockets of solar system and finally leave the system, the scientists theorise.
Sordel Space System (SSS) is a new space technology which is based on retraction force which acts in a ratio inversely proportional to square root of distance from the star, therefore planets revolve in their orbit with this velocity.
So where is the empirical data to validate this new hypotheses? Dr Shah says that the European Space Agency has accepted his papers, while NASA has already employed a space-craft to guage the repulsive forces of the sun.
The Indian Science Institute, Bangalore has reviewed the theory for confirmation and the Swedish Royal Academy of Physics (Nobel Foundation) has accepted his papers and is being "scrutinised".
[Originally published: January 17 2000][/quote]
nou ?
[Original headline: Hubli scientists propose new theory of solar stability ]
Hubli, India: If pure gravitation existed between stellar bodies, then each would be "sucked into" one great whole. Though this sounds a composite philosophical premise, this does not define the physical universe, according to a radically new theory of solar stability.
Two noted astrophysicists from Hubli Dr Navin Shah and Pankaj Jain have put forth the theory of Strepulsion-Retraction as against the Newtonian laws of gravitation and Einsteins theory of relativity.
So is the whole theory of gravitation-relativity incorrect? Yes, says Dr Shah who says that "there are two universal forces strepulsion and retraction. All stars exert Stellar Repulsion Force (SRF) or strepulsion which is repulsive in nature while the planetary bodies exert attractive forces. So in a solar system Retraction is the force which arises when SRF interacts with gravitation. This interaction between SRF and gravitation gives rise to the orbital motion and rotation of the planetary bodies.
Speaking to The Times of India Dr Shah says that, the whole premise of modern physics (read western) which is based on the gravitation-relativity theory is wrong. "The Sun contains 98.8 per cent of the mass of the solar system and the remaining is in the planetary bodies. So if one would go by gravity then all the planets would have been embedded into the Sun. Even Einstein's theory is philosophical paradigm because time and space are constructs of the mind and do not exist."
Elaborating further, Dr Shah says, SRF is originated under Thermonuclear Reactions (TNR) in the stars. Fifty per cent of the energy liberated from the stars under TNR is in the form of strepulsion force and other half contains light, heat and plasma particles. Owing to nuclear origin intensity of SRF is million times greater than gravitational intensity.
The theory can explain all astrophysical phenomenon, expansion, neutron stars, blackholes, meteorites etc and offers celestial occurrences to validate the strepulsion. The other proof that the sun exerts repulsion force is anti-solar ejection of solar wind, anti-solar deflection comet tail, anti-solar defusion of magnetosphere, higher ocean tides on full moon midnight than on new-moon midday, anti-solar displacement of star rays during solar eclipse, radiation of red-shift of star-light in vicinity of the sun.
So now with this new theory what would be its impact on physics? Space-programmes would move years ahead if SRF energy is utilised as fuel to navigate and reach the various pockets of solar system and finally leave the system, the scientists theorise.
Sordel Space System (SSS) is a new space technology which is based on retraction force which acts in a ratio inversely proportional to square root of distance from the star, therefore planets revolve in their orbit with this velocity.
So where is the empirical data to validate this new hypotheses? Dr Shah says that the European Space Agency has accepted his papers, while NASA has already employed a space-craft to guage the repulsive forces of the sun.
The Indian Science Institute, Bangalore has reviewed the theory for confirmation and the Swedish Royal Academy of Physics (Nobel Foundation) has accepted his papers and is being "scrutinised".
[Originally published: January 17 2000][/quote]
nou ?
een beetje tweaker moet toch wel net zo makkelijk engels als nederlands kunnen lezen ?
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/2032/rorty2.jpg?f=community)
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/8563/Yinyang60.jpg?f=community)
:strip_exif()/u/10422/bows.gif?f=community)
/u/3670/tweakerslogo.png?f=community)
:strip_exif()/u/11183/keen2.gif?f=community)