Ik heb ook al een vraag hierover gesteld en ben daarna in de reviews gedoken, kennelijk doet ie in de hogere resoluties (vooral d3d)niet onder voor de wat mindere geforces(SDR bv.) maar een vereiste is een snelle CPU.
Zoek ff in de tweakers dtabase en er is van alles te vinden over deze kaart.
http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/list_messages/50068
Dit is een artikel die ik laatst van iemand kreeg:
Hier een conclusie van een betrouwbare site:
If ATI RAGE FURY MAXX costs not more than the cards on NVIDIA GeForce 256 with SDR memory, then this graphics card will become very popular. As usual, we hope that software developers, namely driver developers, will be more careful and won't ruin the effort of their colleagues who managed to design a successful product. ATI RAGE FURY MAXX card is very well optimized for 32bit color and again, if its price were less than that of NVIDIA GeForce 256 based graphics cards with DDR memory, then from now on the happy owners of fast CPUs would be able to give up 16bit color completely. However, you should always bear in mind such an unpleasant thing as sharp performance upsurges and drops at higher resolutions, which actually spoils the overall impression. Let's hope that the next driver versions will no longer suffer from this drawback. This card is an especially interesting product because it opens a new family of graphics accelerators, which performance will depend strictly on the amount of chipsets installed. Besides, 3dfx company is also going to introduce its own vision of the matter pretty soon. Theoretically, this graphics card with two fully fledged chipsets will probably turn out an excellent solution for dual-monitor systems (the graphics card we had at our disposal could even boast a special place for a corresponding connector).
denk er maar is over na
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/11115/crop5ddd078a6380b_cropped.jpeg?f=community)
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/5126/serv.jpg?f=community)