Q3 Pointrelease v1.25 wel of niet downe?

[Verwijderd]

Ik heb verschillende verhalen gelezen/gehoord dat je deze update beter NIET kunt downloade, het online spelen schijnt trager te gaan en er zijn nog een paar "vreemde" aanpassingen gedaan aan het spel

Meer nieuws erover staat hier: http://www.challenge-eu.com/comments.php3?aid=11372&pageid=6

Nu wil ik wel is weten wat de tweakers hiervan vinden

[SICK]

NIET DOEN !!!
Ik had em vannacht() gedownload en ik heb nu alweer q3 gereïnstalled.

Want je kan geen trickjumps meer maken:( (zoals megahealth jump in dm13) splash damage door plafons is weg. En de 'belangerijke' mods werken niet meer :(zoals: rocket arena3 , osp en cpm(promode)..

dus rede genoeg om het bij 1.17 tehouden.

[Dyxtra]

Heb het ook gelezen

GEEN trickjumps meer, splash damage door platforms weg, dat zijn nogal veranderingen zeg

Check ook http://www.xsreality.com

[Verwijderd]

Wat dacht je van: vermindering(?!!) van strafe-jumping en aircontrol...

Ik bedoel: de aircontrol is al zo belabberd, gaan ze hem ff NOG kutter maken.....

niet downen is mijn advies... de CPL enzo gaan hem vast niet gebruiken.. Clanbase ook nit neem ik aan

[Halo_Master]

Niet doen .

Timedemo's deden het niet meer.
Ik wilde op het net gaan spelen , kon ik maar kiezen tussen 13 servers of zoiets , met allemaal een ping van over de 200!!!!
Ga kijken of ik 1.17 er weer op kan zetten.

[Verwijderd]

Haha, das nog lang niet alles, wat d8 je van nieuwe respawntijd voor MH, 20 rail-ammo ipv 10 bij rail pakken, 50 lightning shafts ipv 100 bij oppakken, enz... VÉÉTTTTTT :(

[Verwijderd]

niet doen!

[Verwijderd]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica>quote:</font><HR>Resistance is futile![/quote]HAHA, nM is dat niet die q3 klen?

rebel gebruikt dit al vanaf qw

niet dat het mij boeit, maar ziet er wel blij uit

[Verwijderd]

Heb ook effe Pointrelease 1.25 geinstalleerd en ben niet echt tevreden.
Kan geen timedemo's meer draaien en de framerate is toch soms wel lager geworden.
Ik kon normaal altijd zonder problemen (60fps)DM9 spelen,....zakt nu soms onder de 10fps, net een diashow !?

Pluspunt is wel dat de lucht op m'n GeForce2 GTS wel mooi is nu

[bombadil]

net als altijd; alleen veranderen als je problemen hebt anders lekker overal vanaf blijven.

[Arzie]

Malfeidor: dan is je S3TC gedisabled nu. S3TC compressed de textures van level 9, zodat ze binnen de 32 MB passen -> snel.
Maar het verneukt ook de sky texture, die nu weer mooi is bij je...

[Verwijderd]

Ik heb gewoon 2x q3 erop staan en kan dus goed vergelijken die 1.25 is volgens mij nog niet aan te raden dus laat maar zitten en wacht op de 1.26 die wel heel snel zal komen.

[Glorix Jim]

Guys.. de pointrelease is ook BETA!!
check dit:<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica>quote:</font><HR>I had a chance to fire off a few questions regarding the recent Quake III v1.25 Beta release to id Software's Robert Duffy. The questions were gleaned from mails received as to what is of concern to the Q3A community. Robert was kind enough to answer promptly, and honestly.

Pappy-R: I was a bit confused by the emotions and reactions of the Q3A community to the features in what I saw as an obvious and clear beta test. Was id Software expecting this kind of reaction at all?

Robert Duffy: We should have done a better job labeling it as a beta. The installation and readme should have clearly stated it instead of just mentioning it in a .plan file. That side of things we could have done a better job on. I don't know that I was expecting much of a reaction, certainly not the initial uproar over the physics change.

Pappy-R: When a Beta is put out and new features introduced, how is the decision made on what to keep? Are there certain features that are non-negotiable, and others that can be taken by public opinion?

Robert Duffy: We are not dropping any features at all. Several things were in this version from Team Arena and those will be taken out of Quake 3 Arena but remain in Team Arena where they belong. I stated that we would pay attention to public opinion on the physics code which we will to some degree. We are not breaking the code to make physics behave exactly like they did. We are either going to implement the code to emulate the way they were or tweak acceleration a bit to give that same feel back ( or at least something very similar ). With that said, I would say that public opinion might be changing, we are starting to see a lot of "don't touch the 1.25 physics" now that it has been out a bit.

Pappy-R: With so much new code, and features involved, id knew the mod community would have major adjustments to make to a new version, even if it's not v1.25 but even a v1.27 or so. Can you see this happening again to a major solid release after Team Arena is released?

Robert Duffy: I don't really expect there to be any major adjustments needed. A few trap calls were added and a few had parameter adjustments. Using good diff and merge software someone should be able get everything together pretty quickly. There will be some detail oriented work for sure but overall it should not be that bad. The code released for 1.26 or whatever the final point release is will be culled straight from the Team Arena source. Beyond that I do not see any major changes beyond bug fixes and normal enhancements.

Pappy-R: There was a few bugs and/or broken features in the v1.25 release that were solid in v1.17. Were these overlooked or just not considered to be the focus for v1.25, and left undone?

Robert Duffy: We did not release anything broken on purpose. If something is screwed up or broken it is our fault.[/quote]geript van www.planetquake.com