Hallo,
Ik wil mijn cd'collectie op mijn hd zetten, wat is de beste en snelste converter??
Groeten
Ik wil mijn cd'collectie op mijn hd zetten, wat is de beste en snelste converter??
Groeten
When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and suddenly I realized that I was talking to myself
I'm not a vegitarian because I love animals, I'm a vegitarian because I hate plants! - Jade©
Anoniem: 21405
Fuji X-T1 | XF14mm F2.8 R | XF23mm F1.4 R | XF35mm F1.4 R
Nikon D800 | AF-S 24-120/f4 VR2 | AF-S 50/f1.8G
Computer specs
"The thing under my bed waiting to grab my ankle isn't real. I know that, and I also know that if I'm careful to keep my foot under the covers, it will never be able to grab my ankle." - Stephen King
Quinta: 3 januari 2005
Nieuwe M3 Macbook of iMac kopen? Check: Apple M3 Prijs Overzicht
Op donderdag 01 november 2001 16:44 schreef Xion het volgende:
AudioCatalyst
Op donderdag 01 november 2001 16:41 schreef Morpheus25 het volgende:
voor wav --> Mp3?
Dan is er maar 1 keuze: De LAME encoder.
Zoek maar ff onder google naar LAME.
[tip]
Wat je ook doet, gebruik geen XING.(Wordt standard geleverd bij audiocatalyst enzo. Die encoder zuigt echt.
* Exterazzo heeft er nog spijt van dat zijn eerste 50 mp3 door XING ge-encodeerd zijn.
Sorry, begrijp me niet verkeerd. Audiocatalyst is een leuk programma om alles alleen naar WAV te rippen.Op donderdag 01 november 2001 16:44 schreef Xion het volgende:
AudioCatalyst
"The thing under my bed waiting to grab my ankle isn't real. I know that, and I also know that if I'm careful to keep my foot under the covers, it will never be able to grab my ankle." - Stephen King
Quinta: 3 januari 2005
FF gezocht:Op donderdag 01 november 2001 16:51 schreef Hallers het volgende:
Ik dacht dat de Fraunhofer (of zoiets, whatever) de beste was? Waarom hoor ik daar niemand over (ja OK, een berichie over MuziekMuts)? Ik dacht dat de Fraunhofer-codec ook in CoolEdit zit, en dat is toch ook niet het minste audio-progje dacht ik zo.
En voor wat betreft XING: Check de plaatjes op deze site: http://www.incase.de/lame-xing-compare/Q. How does the quality of MP3 files produced by Lame compare to other MP3 encoders ?
A. Most free-to-use "encoders" are just front ends for other encoders - many are just cleaned up and faster versions of the original buggy ISO demonstration encoder (example: BladeEnc, 8Hz, most free Windows encoders). The problem with these is that the quality at any bitrate is noticeably inferior to the commercial encoders (such as the those from Fraunhofer IIS or Xing). Lame has a completely rewritten psychoacoustic model and improved bit allocation, hence its quality is almost the same as the Fraunhofer encoder.
Q. How can I compare the quality of different MP3 encoders ?
A1. Have a look at the arstechnica comparison of the LAME v3.61 encoding engine against many other encoders, or from a music archiving point of view, the r3mix comparison for a thorough analysis of LAME v3.70 and v3.80 against Xing and Fraunhofer engines.
A2. Obtain a 44 KHz stereo wav file of a techno song, with many sharp transitions in it (Around The World by Daft Punk is a good example) and encode at 64 kbits using both encoders. MP3s produced by ISO based encoders will sound very distorted (bubbly), while the one produced by encoders such as Lame or Fraunhofer sounds almost normal . "But nobody encodes at 64 kbits !!!" I hear you say. True . Encoding at 64 kbits is only meant to quickly demonstrate the difference in quality. To really hear the difference at 128 kbits, you need a decent pair of speakers or good headphones and then listen to the original followed by the encoded version. You'd be surprised how crappy the ISO encoder is. The quality of encoders is now even more important since people are transmitting low-bitrate MP3s as internet-radio using Shoutcast or IceCast.
Bron
Van dezelfde bron als hierboven:Not recommended: Older Fraunhofer encoders like those found in MusicMatch 5.0, Nero 5.10, and CoolEdit due to problems with higher frequencies that few people can hear; MusicMatch 6.0 not recommended due to bug in latest Fraunhofer Codec; Xing encoding at 128kbps (higher bitrate produces better MP3s). Recommended at 128kbps are FastEnc and LAME v.3.88. MusicMatch 6.10 and above.
bron
* Schonhose rest his case for nowXing encoders (Xing, AudioCatalyst, Mpeg DJ) reveal distortion when listening with headphones and encodes above 16Hz have problems. CBR at 256kbps by LAME is excellent if space isn't that big of an issue. CBR 192kbps encodes by Fraunhofer encoders are a good balance between size and quality. LAME produces best VBR encoded files. MusicMatch is not recommended due to poor ripping and encoding quality.
"The thing under my bed waiting to grab my ankle isn't real. I know that, and I also know that if I'm careful to keep my foot under the covers, it will never be able to grab my ankle." - Stephen King
Quinta: 3 januari 2005
Eigenlijk wel vreemd, Fraunhoffer is toch de bedenker van het formaat MP3?Op donderdag 01 november 2001 17:53 schreef Pc123 het volgende:
De nieuwste is Lame zelf beter dan Fraunhofer en gratis
"The shell stopped unexpectedly and Explorer.exe was restarted."
Anoniem: 19082
Anoniem: 2553
da's de grafische interface voor de mp3 encoder, dat ding heet gewoon LameOp donderdag 01 november 2001 16:29 schreef Courage het volgende:
Razorlame wordt door veel mensen het beste gevonden en dat is al zoooooo vaak voorbij gekomen, gebruik de search even voor het bewijs.
AMD Phenom II X4 // 8 GB DDR2 // SAMSUNG 830 SSD // 840 EVO SSD // Daar is Sinterklaas alweer!!
Apple iPhone 16e LG OLED evo G5 Google Pixel 10 Samsung Galaxy S25 Star Wars: Outlaws Nintendo Switch 2 Apple AirPods Pro (2e generatie) Sony PlayStation 5 Pro
Tweakers is onderdeel van
DPG Media B.V.
Alle rechten voorbehouden - Auteursrecht © 1998 - 2025
•
Hosting door TrueFullstaq