Ik heb dit vanochtend al gestuurd naar tweakers.net maar het is niet interessant genoeg ofzo 
Athlon 1866MHz vs P4 2000MHz
BAPCO SysMark 2001
System Intenet Business Overall
SYS 1.886GHz 196 196 196
Intel P4 2.0GHz 215 163 186
Intel P4 1.8GHz 198 154 175
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 155 156 155
Yes, we know. Some think that BAPCO's SysMark 2001's use of applications with SSE optimizations gives Intel processors an unfair advantage. But the programs included in this benchmark (Office, Photoshop, Flash, Media Encoder) are applications many of us use. So while it's certainly not a perfect benchmarking program, it is nonetheless a good one to use in looking at a system's overall performance.
As we see in this first test, using BAPCO's SysMark 2001 as a measure of performance in some typically used applications, the SYS Cold-Fusion 1886 desktop gets the higest score, though it comes up short on the Internet test. But while it beats every other system, including the one with an Intel P4 2.0GHz processor, it does so by a margin of only 5% and at a huge price premium.
Business Winstone 2001
System Score
SYS 1.886GHz 70
Intel P4 2.0GHz 55.3
Intel P4 1.8GHz 52.9
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 56
Content Creation Winstone 2001
System Score
SYS 1.886GHz 83.9
Intel P4 2.0GHz 72
Intel P4 1.8GHz 67.8
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 73.4
In these two benchmarks, both from ZD, the SYS Cold-Fusion 1886 easily outperforms every other processor we tested. And this came as no great surprise, given that the 1.4GHz Athlon was already beating even a 2GHz P4. The real question here is... is a 10% boost in Content Creation Winstone 2001, or a 25% boost in Business Winstone 2001, worth $1885 to you? Because that's how much more than an otherwise identical Athlon 1.4GHz system the Cold-Fusion desktop costs.
3DMark2001 Pro 1024x768 32 bit Performance
System Score
SYS 1.886GHz 5705
Intel P4 2.0GHz 5884
Intel P4 1.8GHz 5745
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 5159
dit is dus zonder pc 2400 geheugen en zonder de KT266A chipset!
Athlon 1866MHz vs P4 2000MHz
BAPCO SysMark 2001
System Intenet Business Overall
SYS 1.886GHz 196 196 196
Intel P4 2.0GHz 215 163 186
Intel P4 1.8GHz 198 154 175
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 155 156 155
Yes, we know. Some think that BAPCO's SysMark 2001's use of applications with SSE optimizations gives Intel processors an unfair advantage. But the programs included in this benchmark (Office, Photoshop, Flash, Media Encoder) are applications many of us use. So while it's certainly not a perfect benchmarking program, it is nonetheless a good one to use in looking at a system's overall performance.
As we see in this first test, using BAPCO's SysMark 2001 as a measure of performance in some typically used applications, the SYS Cold-Fusion 1886 desktop gets the higest score, though it comes up short on the Internet test. But while it beats every other system, including the one with an Intel P4 2.0GHz processor, it does so by a margin of only 5% and at a huge price premium.
Business Winstone 2001
System Score
SYS 1.886GHz 70
Intel P4 2.0GHz 55.3
Intel P4 1.8GHz 52.9
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 56
Content Creation Winstone 2001
System Score
SYS 1.886GHz 83.9
Intel P4 2.0GHz 72
Intel P4 1.8GHz 67.8
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 73.4
In these two benchmarks, both from ZD, the SYS Cold-Fusion 1886 easily outperforms every other processor we tested. And this came as no great surprise, given that the 1.4GHz Athlon was already beating even a 2GHz P4. The real question here is... is a 10% boost in Content Creation Winstone 2001, or a 25% boost in Business Winstone 2001, worth $1885 to you? Because that's how much more than an otherwise identical Athlon 1.4GHz system the Cold-Fusion desktop costs.
3DMark2001 Pro 1024x768 32 bit Performance
System Score
SYS 1.886GHz 5705
Intel P4 2.0GHz 5884
Intel P4 1.8GHz 5745
AMD Athlon 1.4GHz 5159
dit is dus zonder pc 2400 geheugen en zonder de KT266A chipset!
