Een wappie is iemand die gevallen is voor de (jarenlange) Russische desinformatiecampagnes.
Wantrouwen en confirmation bias doen de rest.
En wat wil je hier nu precies mee vragen, vertellen of bediscussiëren met je clickbaiterige titel?
Zet het daar maar neer! -- It's time to party like it's 1984 -- Soundcloud
@TS: kan je een samenvatting geven en wat is jouw mening?
d:)b
Los van wat op wikipedia staat:wat op tv wordt uitgezonden moet je altijd met een stevige korrel zout tot je nemen.
En dit staat er op wikipedia:
A series of episodes (Heart of the Matter, Parts 1 and 2) broadcast in October 2013 which questioned the link between saturated fat, cholesterol and heart disease, as well as the widespread use of anti-cholesterol drugs known as statins, have come under fire from doctors and the National Heart Foundation of Australia.[5] The Foundation estimates that in the wake of those episodes up to 55,000 patients may have stopped taking their medication, leading to a potential increase in heart attacks and strokes over the next five years.[6] In May 2014 the ABC removed both episodes from its website,[7] after an internal review found that the second episode (but not the first) involved one breach of ABC standards on impartiality and there was a problem of omission of important information.[8]
Dus, niks doofpot of iets dergelijks zo te zien ;-)
En dit staat er op wikipedia:
A series of episodes (Heart of the Matter, Parts 1 and 2) broadcast in October 2013 which questioned the link between saturated fat, cholesterol and heart disease, as well as the widespread use of anti-cholesterol drugs known as statins, have come under fire from doctors and the National Heart Foundation of Australia.[5] The Foundation estimates that in the wake of those episodes up to 55,000 patients may have stopped taking their medication, leading to a potential increase in heart attacks and strokes over the next five years.[6] In May 2014 the ABC removed both episodes from its website,[7] after an internal review found that the second episode (but not the first) involved one breach of ABC standards on impartiality and there was a problem of omission of important information.[8]
Dus, niks doofpot of iets dergelijks zo te zien ;-)
Met enkel wat filmpjes en insinuaties kan er nooit een discussie van de grond komen. Dit topic gaat op slot.
't Het nog nooit, nog nooit zo donker west, of 't wer altied wel weer licht
Dit topic is gesloten.