Volgens mij zal er in de AS600 een IPS paneel zitten (met dus brakke contrastwaarden) net als in bijv. de "hogere" 650, deze 640's hebben wel een goed paneel erin volgens de testen/reviews

.
edit: lees net dat de AS600 ook een VA paneel heeft maar wel van een hele andere fabrikant .
(deze 640 moet het ook opnemen tegen de Sony W8'n en Samsung H6400/6600 dus voor de prijs van een W6 echt een koopje in dat opzicht)
Praktisch gezien valt de lag op zich ook wel mee ja, alleen vergeleken met veel andere tv's wel aan de hogere kant

.
van HDTV.co.uk
What does this mean? When you read about an HDTV’s input lag result (in miliseconds), it’s important to know if the number was obtained using Leo Bodnar’s device or the photo method. As a rough rule of thumb, we wouldn’t mind playing video games which demand fast reflexes (e.g. first-person shooters like Call Of Duty, Halo or Battlefield 3) on TVs whose input lag measured 33ms or below (i.e. 2 frames or less) using the stopwatch/camera method, or 40ms or less via the Leo Bodnar lag tester.
Obviously, the lower the input lag, the greater the responsiveness, so if you’re an FPS veteran looking for a top-notch, fantastically fluid gaming experience, we recommend getting a television with input lag measuring not more than 16ms (photo) or 25ms (Leo Bodnar) respectively.
En verder nog over lag cijfers bij LCD vs plasma
When we first got our hands on the Leo Bodnar device, we were surprised when we obtained (nearly) the same 48ms figure from a Panasonic ST50 PDP (plasma display panel) and a new Panasonic ET60 LED LCD (both running in their fastest Game mode). From our experience of playing a decent amount of first-person shooter games online, the Panasonic ST50 is a total joy to play on compared to the LCD. The former feels considerably smoother than the latter, but both are returning basically the same figure.
Or, put another way, we can believe the figures returned by the lag tester, but began to wonder if it’s being harsher on plasmas. Here’s our theory on why this is.
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/input-lag (halverwege)
Key Takeaways
When reading a published input lag figure, find out if it’s taken using the traditional stopwatch cloning/ high-speed camera method or with the newer Leo Bodnar lag tester device. Because the latter generally returns a higher number than the former, comparison between different displays is most meaningful when the same method is used.
The camera method would appear to take into account the difference caused by a plasma’s subfield driving method in a way which the Leo Bodnar lag tester does not.
For the photo method, an input lag between 16ms and 33ms is good; ≤ 16ms is excellent.
A Leo Bodnar-derived figure between 25ms and 40ms is good; ≤ 25ms is excellent.
Bij hdtv 59ms gemeten overigens via Bodnar methode bij de 40 inch ...
[
Voor 109% gewijzigd door
apis29 op 06-08-2014 13:32
]