De benq is niet direct beter.. één review van hardware.info en je bent al overtuigd?
ze zien daar niet eens verschil bij de input lag..
Daarnaast heeft de benq ook een VA paneel ipv een IPS paneel.
Benq
"The BenQ GW2450HM was a very pleasing improvement to some of the other AMVA based screens we've tested over the last year or so, including the older BenQ EW2420, BenQ EW2730V and more recently the Philips 273E3QHSB. We'd always been impressed by the low cost of these models which made for an interesting alternative to the wide range of cheap TN Film screens flooding the market. However, each time we'd been quite disappointed by the poor pixel response times and this was an obvious limitation with these modern AMVA panels. Thankfully that seems to have changed and the latest generation of panel used here in the GW2450HM was much better. Finally pixel response times were at a level allowing this screen to compete with the popular IPS alternatives out there.
We continue to be impressed as well by the very high static contrast ratios of AMVA technology, although we are still to see a panel which achieves as high as the 5000:1 spec we're starting to see advertised. A calibrated figure of ~2500:1 is not to be sniffed at of course so it's still excellent and continues to be a strong point of VA matrices. This model even had a working and usable dynamic contrast ratio which is pretty rare for the desktop monitor market.
We did feel that the screen was a little lacking in some areas though. There were limited adjustments available from the stand but we can understand why these have been left off to keep costs down. AMVA panels are not great from a viewing angle perspective and do fall behind IPS in this area. They are better than TN Film though and really this seems to be one of the only weaker areas it seems of modern AMVA panels."
| Pro's | Vastly improved pixel responsiveness compared with other AMVA panels we have tested in recent times | Excellent black depth and contrast ratio | Useable and working Dynamic Contrast Ratio function |
| Con's | Black depth and contrast ratio perhaps not as good as we'd hoped given spec (still excellent though) | Limited ergonomic adjustments from stand | Some limitations with AMVA viewing angles inherent to technology |
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/benq_gw2450hm.htm
vs
Dell ultrasharp
"The Dell U2312HM was pretty much everything we have come to expect from a Dell UltraSharp screen. It was pleasing to see Dell have stuck with an e-IPS panel and the decent feature and function set of the older model (U2311H) has been retained. The major technology change here is the move away from CCFL and towards a W-LED backlighting unit. In practical terms this only really offers the end user a slightly thinner profile and a slightly lower power consumption compared with the older screen. There are environmental advantages as well and it's a big trend at the moment so you can see why its been done with this model and others in their range.
From a performance point of view I was impressed in a couple of areas particularly. The input lag was incredibly low and basically this screen had no lag at all. Panel uniformity from our retail stock sample was also very good which was a positive sign considering there have been mixed reports and issues in the past with lower cost e-IPS screens. Let's hope other experiences are the same. Default colour setup was good as well, and responsiveness was very good, making it one of the faster 23" IPS models we have tested for sure. On the other hand I was a little disappointed by the quite low contrast ratio of 710:1 once calibrated. This was moderate for an IPS panel and not what we had hoped for considering what we had seen on other recent IPS screens, including the 24" U2412M."
| Pro's | Very low input lag, basically no lag at all | Good panel uniformity from our sample | Very good pixel responsiveness for gaming |
| Con's | Lowest luminance setting is still quite high, may not be suitable for those in darker environments or who want a darker screen. (= minder energie verspilling  ) | Dynamic contrast ratio does not work in practice | Black depth and contrast ratio not as good as we'd hoped |
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_u2312hm.htm
dus om direct te zeggen dat de benq beter is..
[
Voor 133% gewijzigd door
SmokingCrop op 11-04-2013 22:20
]
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/508740/lol.jpg?f=community)
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/494759/rsz_3cb4b58d22ffd3291626103ea3e4e015.jpg?f=community)
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/438947/crop575c94eea6d14.jpeg?f=community)