Het zou niet de eerste keer zijn:
http://google.com/?q=Kaspersky+doubleclick.net
In het topic op het Kasperky-forum uit 2009 wordt precies omschreven waarom:
actually your right lucian - google lists it under spyware
The plot is when a page displays google adwords - you pick up a doubleclick cookie - then that keeps trace of where your going - and then the adverts you see are based more on the pages you visit - instead of just random based on the page there on.
doubleclick have this on there FAQ page:
IMPORTANT: IF YOU DELETE YOUR OPT-OUT COOKIE, YOU WILL NEED TO OPT-OUT AGAIN. IF YOUR BROWSER BLOCKS ALL OR THIRD-PARTY COOKIES, YOU WILL BLOCK THE SETTING OF OPT-OUT COOKIES.
You guys make what i consider to be the number one product on the market - and so when big companies use cookies and demand i have to have an "opt out" - to something i would never agree to opt into - as i cant imagine any kaspersky user wanting to opt in or out of such a scheme -
I would like kaspersky to block it - no company should force users to have opt out cookies - thats like saying "we must install" im actually fairly surprised google would do this - surely they realise once this gets out and is widely known the backlash is going to happen.
Hence i request please kaspersky when companies do this to us - block em lol by default i dont opt in to anything its my computer i choose what does or does not get stored on it
En dat is dus tegen EU-regels m.b.t. Cookies. Koekjes moeten vooraf gemeld worden, of meteen de mogelijkheid bieden om er vanaf te komen/blijven. Zodra ik ads kreeg met het bekende driehoekje (het Opt-out formulier) was de melding weg. Ik vermoed dat Kaspersky inmiddels nauwkeurig genoeg is om het onderscheid tussen beiden (met of zonder optout mogelijkheid) te maken.
[
Voor 91% gewijzigd door
Ulysses op 29-05-2012 09:36
]
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/961/crop687fa3fc8a3e4_cropped.jpg?f=community)
:strip_exif()/u/16879/brant.gif?f=community)
:strip_icc():strip_exif()/u/220992/profilemini_sharp_dark.jpg?f=community)